Leaderboards
Stonehill Skyhawks

Stonehill Skyhawks

NECOTHER

2025-26 Drought Profile · 30 games played · 10-20 (32%)

Stonehill Skyhawks ranks 9th of 10 NEC teams in droughts per game (2.27 dpg, above the NEC average of 1.99). Their droughts average 4:02 — near the NEC norm — and have allowed opponents an average of 6.8 pts per drought, contributing to 13 influenced losses (5 decisive/major) this season.

Drought Profile

Droughts/Game

2.27

Conf avg: 2.0 · #9 of 10 in NEC

9th in NEC

+0.28/game vs NEC avg

#9 in NEC (10 teams)

Avg Duration

4:02

Conf avg: 241.6 · #7 of 10 in NEC

+0:01 vs NEC avg

How long cold streaks typically last

Avg Pts Allowed

6.8

Conf avg: 7.4 · #2 of 10 in NEC

-0.6 pts vs NEC avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game Impact

Influenced Losses

13

5 decisive/major — close losses where droughts swung the margin

Timeout Rate

16%

Coach called a timeout in 11 of 68 droughts

Record w/ 2+ Droughts

4-16

vs 6-5 in games with 0–1 droughts

Drought Trend This Season
Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 2.3 droughts/game.
When Droughts Happen
Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 68 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.
Half Breakdown
1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?
1st Half
45
droughts · avg 4:02
2nd Half
23
droughts · avg 4:02
Drought Cost by Severity
How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points — see if critical ones truly hurt more.
Notable (3–4 min)
38
56% of droughts
5.7 pts allowed
Significant (4–5 min)
21
31% of droughts
7.3 pts allowed
Critical (5+ min)
9
13% of droughts
10.2 pts allowed

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.7 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.3 pts
Critical (5+ min)
10.2 pts

Key Takeaway

Critical droughts allow 79% more points than notable ones (10.2 vs 5.7 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-Ending Shots
What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.
3-PT(32%)2-PT(43%)FT(25%)
3-Ptr (22, 32%)2-Ptr (29, 43%)FT (17, 25%)
Score Differential by Game
Every game plotted over 40 minutes — positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.
Mar 7
Mercyhurst Lakers@ Mercyhurst Lakers
L 51–56
Mar 4
Le Moyne Dolphins@ Le Moyne Dolphins
W 81–71
Feb 28
Mercyhurst Lakersvs Mercyhurst Lakers
T 55–55
Feb 26
Saint Francis Red Flashvs Saint Francis Red Flash
W 70–50
Feb 21
Le Moyne Dolphinsvs Le Moyne Dolphins
W 77–68
Feb 19
New Haven Chargers@ New Haven Chargers
L 51–64
Feb 14
Wagner Seahawksvs Wagner Seahawks
L 57–68
Feb 12
Chicago State Cougars@ Chicago State Cougars
L 55–68
Feb 7
Long Island University Sharks@ Long Island University Sharks
L 54–61
Feb 5
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights@ Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
L 58–74
Jan 31
Le Moyne Dolphins@ Le Moyne Dolphins
W 65–54
Jan 29
Fairleigh Dickinson Knightsvs Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
W 58–57
Jan 26
Central Connecticut Blue Devilsvs Central Connecticut Blue Devils
W 61–59
Jan 23
Long Island University Sharksvs Long Island University Sharks
L 63–66
Jan 19
Saint Francis Red Flash@ Saint Francis Red Flash
L 61–63
Jan 17
Mercyhurst Lakers@ Mercyhurst Lakers
W 62–57
Jan 10
Chicago State Cougarsvs Chicago State Cougars
W 85–82
Jan 8
Central Connecticut Blue Devils@ Central Connecticut Blue Devils
L 69–76
Jan 4
Wagner Seahawks@ Wagner Seahawks
W 69–60
Jan 2
New Haven Chargersvs New Haven Chargers
L 55–70
Dec 22
Syracuse Orange@ Syracuse Orange
L 48–77
Dec 17
New Hampshire Wildcats@ New Hampshire Wildcats
L 58–59
Dec 12
vs Vermont State - Johnson Badgers
W 101–60
Dec 2
Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant Bulldogs
L 65–77
Nov 30
Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac Bobcats
L 62–76
Nov 26
UMass Lowell River Hawksvs UMass Lowell River Hawks
L 64–75
Nov 17
Iowa State Cyclones@ Iowa State Cyclones
L 57–96
Nov 15
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
L 63–74
Nov 14
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield Stags
L 71–73
Nov 11
Rhode Island Rams@ Rhode Island Rams
L 57–80
Nov 7
DePaul Blue Demons@ DePaul Blue Demons
L 64–72
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →
Game Log
Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 7Mercyhurst Lakers@ Mercyhurst LakersL 56-51
3
Mar 4Le Moyne Dolphins@ Le Moyne DolphinsW 71-81
1
Feb 28Mercyhurst Lakersvs Mercyhurst LakersT 55-55
2
Feb 26Saint Francis Red Flashvs Saint Francis Red FlashW 70-50
1
Feb 21Le Moyne Dolphinsvs Le Moyne DolphinsW 77-680
Feb 19New Haven Chargers@ New Haven ChargersL 64-51
3
Feb 14Wagner Seahawksvs Wagner SeahawksL 57-68
6
Feb 12Chicago State Cougars@ Chicago State CougarsL 68-55
3
Feb 7Long Island University Sharks@ Long Island University SharksL 61-54
4
Feb 5Fairleigh Dickinson Knights@ Fairleigh Dickinson KnightsL 74-58
2
Jan 31Le Moyne Dolphins@ Le Moyne DolphinsW 54-65
1
Jan 29Fairleigh Dickinson Knightsvs Fairleigh Dickinson KnightsW 58-57
3
Jan 26Central Connecticut Blue Devilsvs Central Connecticut Blue DevilsW 61-59
3
Jan 23Long Island University Sharksvs Long Island University SharksL 63-66
1
Jan 19Saint Francis Red Flash@ Saint Francis Red FlashL 63-61
2
Jan 17Mercyhurst Lakers@ Mercyhurst LakersW 57-62
1
Jan 10Chicago State Cougarsvs Chicago State CougarsW 85-82
2
Jan 8Central Connecticut Blue Devils@ Central Connecticut Blue DevilsL 76-69
1
Jan 4Wagner Seahawks@ Wagner SeahawksW 60-69
4
Jan 2New Haven Chargersvs New Haven ChargersL 55-70
3
Dec 22Syracuse Orange@ Syracuse OrangeL 77-48
3
Dec 17New Hampshire Wildcats@ New Hampshire WildcatsL 59-58
2
Dec 12vs Vermont State - Johnson BadgersW 101-60
1
Dec 2Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant BulldogsL 77-65
2
Nov 30Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac BobcatsL 76-62
1
Nov 26UMass Lowell River Hawksvs UMass Lowell River HawksL 64-75
2
Nov 17Iowa State Cyclones@ Iowa State CyclonesL 96-57
2
Nov 15Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsL 63-74
1
Nov 14Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 73-71
3
Nov 11Rhode Island Rams@ Rhode Island RamsL 80-57
4
Nov 7DePaul Blue Demons@ DePaul Blue DemonsL 72-64
1
Drought-Influenced Losses
Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Defensive cost" = points allowed during drought periods.
Wagner Seahawksvs Wagner SeahawksL 57-68Feb 14
39 pts allowed during 6 droughts (57.4% of 11-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Long Island University Sharks@ Long Island University SharksL 54-61Feb 7
30 pts allowed during 4 droughts (49.2% of 7-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Chicago State Cougars@ Chicago State CougarsL 55-68Feb 12
24 pts allowed during 3 droughts (35.3% of 13-pt margin)
Major Factor
New Haven Chargersvs New Haven ChargersL 55-70Jan 2
23 pts allowed during 3 droughts (32.9% of 15-pt margin)
Major Factor
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 71-73Nov 14
21 pts allowed during 3 droughts (28.8% of 2-pt margin)
Major Factor
UMass Lowell River Hawksvs UMass Lowell River HawksL 64-75Nov 26
16 pts allowed during 2 droughts (21.3% of 11-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant BulldogsL 65-77Dec 2
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (18.2% of 12-pt margin)
Significant Factor
New Haven Chargers@ New Haven ChargersL 51-64Feb 19
13 pts allowed during 3 droughts (20.3% of 13-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Mercyhurst Lakers@ Mercyhurst LakersL 51-56Mar 7
11 pts allowed during 3 droughts (19.6% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
DePaul Blue Demons@ DePaul Blue DemonsL 64-72Nov 7
10 pts allowed during 1 drought (13.9% of 8-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac BobcatsL 62-76Nov 30
9 pts allowed during 1 drought (11.8% of 14-pt margin)
Minor Factor
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsL 63-74Nov 15
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (10.8% of 11-pt margin)
Minor Factor
New Hampshire Wildcats@ New Hampshire WildcatsL 58-59Dec 17
8 pts allowed during 2 droughts (13.6% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Drought Killers
Players who most often ended Stonehill Skyhawks scoring droughts this season.
1
CS
Chas Stinson
31% clutchⓘ
16
2
HK
Hermann Koffi
17% clutchⓘ
12
3
RE
Raymond Espinal-Guzman
36% clutchⓘ
11
4
DH
Davante Hackett
22% clutchⓘ
9
5
RS
Rex Sunderland
33% clutchⓘ
6
6
RT
Ridvan Tutic
40% clutchⓘ
5
7
TR
Trenton Ruth
25% clutchⓘ
4
8
EM
Ethan Meuser
0% clutchⓘ
3
3PT
2PT
FT