Leaderboards
Quinnipiac Bobcats

Quinnipiac Bobcats

MAACOTHER

2025-26 Drought Profile · 22 games played · 19-12 (61%)

Quinnipiac Bobcats ranks 3rd of 13 MAAC teams in droughts per game (1.91 dpg, below the MAAC average of 2.07). Their droughts average 3:43 — 0:10 below the MAAC norm — and have allowed opponents an average of 6.5 pts per drought, contributing to 5 influenced losses (2 decisive/major) this season.

Drought Profile

Droughts/Game

1.91

Conf avg: 2.1 · #3 of 13 in MAAC

3rd in MAAC

-0.16/game vs MAAC avg

#3 in MAAC (13 teams)

Avg Duration

3:43

Conf avg: 232.5 · #4 of 13 in MAAC

-0:10 vs MAAC avg

How long cold streaks typically last

Avg Pts Allowed

6.5

Conf avg: 7.3 · #1 of 13 in MAAC

-0.8 pts vs MAAC avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game Impact

Influenced Losses

5

2 decisive/major — close losses where droughts swung the margin

Timeout Rate

12%

Coach called a timeout in 5 of 42 droughts

Record w/ 2+ Droughts

9-4

vs 10-8 in games with 0–1 droughts

Drought Trend This Season
Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.9 droughts/game.
When Droughts Happen
Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 42 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.
Half Breakdown
1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?
1st Half
24
droughts · avg 3:39
2nd Half
18
droughts · avg 3:49
Drought Cost by Severity
How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points — see if critical ones truly hurt more.
Notable (3–4 min)
30
71% of droughts
5.7 pts allowed
Significant (4–5 min)
9
21% of droughts
8.6 pts allowed
Critical (5+ min)
3
7% of droughts
8.7 pts allowed

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.7 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8.6 pts
Critical (5+ min)
8.7 pts

Key Takeaway

Critical droughts allow 53% more points than notable ones (8.7 vs 5.7 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-Ending Shots
What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.
3-PT(26%)2-PT(55%)FT(19%)
3-Ptr (11, 26%)2-Ptr (23, 55%)FT (8, 19%)
Score Differential by Game
Every game plotted over 40 minutes — positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.
Mar 7
Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red Foxes
L 75–77
Mar 1
Canisius Golden Griffins@ Canisius Golden Griffins
W 67–63
Feb 27
Niagara Purple Eagles@ Niagara Purple Eagles
L 76–78
Feb 22
Fairfield Stagsvs Fairfield Stags
L 79–85
Feb 15
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
L 49–56
Feb 13
Siena Saints@ Siena Saints
W 74–62
Feb 7
Niagara Purple Eaglesvs Niagara Purple Eagles
W 56–55
Feb 5
Canisius Golden Griffinsvs Canisius Golden Griffins
W 75–60
Feb 1
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield Stags
W 72–65
Jan 30
Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart Pioneers
L 91–98
Jan 24
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red Foxes
L 64–71
Jan 22
Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers@ Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers
W 77–62
Jan 19
Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan Jaspers
W 98–92
Jan 17
Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack Warriors
L 71–83
Jan 14
Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's Peacocks
L 70–74
Jan 11
Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart Pioneers
W 70–60
Jan 4
Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers
W 80–69
Jan 2
Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan Jaspers
L 79–80
Dec 29
Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red Foxes
W 64–58
Dec 21
Hofstra Pride@ Hofstra Pride
L 66–74
Dec 17
Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth Hawks
W 85–75
Dec 13
UMass Lowell River Hawksvs UMass Lowell River Hawks
W 75–71
Dec 7
Rider Broncsvs Rider Broncs
W 72–58
Dec 5
Iona Gaels@ Iona Gaels
W 89–68
Nov 30
Stonehill Skyhawksvs Stonehill Skyhawks
W 76–62
Nov 25
UCF Knights@ UCF Knights
L 91–102
Nov 23
Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh Panthers
W 83–75
Nov 19
vs City College NY Beavers
W 112–52
Nov 16
Maine Black Bears@ Maine Black Bears
W 70–64
Nov 11
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
L 60–97
Nov 6
Central Connecticut Blue Devilsvs Central Connecticut Blue Devils
W 71–49
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →
Game Log
Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 7Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red FoxesL 75-77
1
Mar 1Canisius Golden Griffins@ Canisius Golden GriffinsW 63-670
Feb 27Niagara Purple Eagles@ Niagara Purple EaglesL 78-760
Feb 22Fairfield Stagsvs Fairfield StagsL 79-850
Feb 15Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 49-56
4
Feb 13Siena Saints@ Siena SaintsW 62-74
1
Feb 7Niagara Purple Eaglesvs Niagara Purple EaglesW 56-55
3
Feb 5Canisius Golden Griffinsvs Canisius Golden GriffinsW 75-600
Feb 1Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsW 65-72
2
Jan 30Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart PioneersL 91-980
Jan 24Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesL 71-64
2
Jan 22Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers@ Mount St. Mary's MountaineersW 62-77
2
Jan 19Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan JaspersW 98-92
1
Jan 17Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack WarriorsL 83-71
1
Jan 14Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's PeacocksL 70-74
2
Jan 11Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart PioneersW 60-70
2
Jan 4Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's MountaineersW 80-69
2
Jan 2Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan JaspersL 80-79
1
Dec 29Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red FoxesW 64-58
4
Dec 21Hofstra Pride@ Hofstra PrideL 74-66
1
Dec 17Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth HawksW 75-85
1
Dec 13UMass Lowell River Hawksvs UMass Lowell River HawksW 75-710
Dec 7Rider Broncsvs Rider BroncsW 72-58
3
Dec 5Iona Gaels@ Iona GaelsW 68-89
2
Nov 30Stonehill Skyhawksvs Stonehill SkyhawksW 76-620
Nov 25UCF Knights@ UCF KnightsL 102-910
Nov 23Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh PanthersW 75-83
1
Nov 19vs City College NY BeaversW 112-520
Nov 16Maine Black Bears@ Maine Black BearsW 64-70
2
Nov 11Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 60-97
3
Nov 6Central Connecticut Blue Devilsvs Central Connecticut Blue DevilsW 71-49
1
Drought-Influenced Losses
Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Defensive cost" = points allowed during drought periods.
Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's PeacocksL 70-74Jan 14
22 pts allowed during 2 droughts (29.7% of 4-pt margin)
Major Factor
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 49-56Feb 15
18 pts allowed during 4 droughts (32.1% of 7-pt margin)
Major Factor
Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack WarriorsL 71-83Jan 17
14 pts allowed during 1 drought (16.9% of 12-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesL 64-71Jan 24
11 pts allowed during 2 droughts (15.5% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red FoxesL 75-77Mar 7
10 pts allowed during 1 drought (13% of 2-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Drought Killers
Players who most often ended Quinnipiac Bobcats scoring droughts this season.
1
KM
Keith Mcknight
55% clutchⓘ
11
2
JZ
Jaden Zimmerman
75% clutchⓘ
8
3
GR
Grant Randall
71% clutchⓘ
7
4
AJ
Asim Jones
86% clutchⓘ
7
5
AM
Amarri Monroe
33% clutchⓘ
3
6
NG
Nate Guerengomba
2
7
BR
Braylan Ritvo
2
3PT
2PT
FT